Page
174 stopped me cold. Unless the novelist wanted legal trouble,
something had to change.
In
editing the novel, I’d already checked the copyright and
permissions page. I saw the usual boilerplate acknowledging use by
permission from several Scripture versions. But nothing about song
lyrics.
Ideally,
the author would have two choices. But this project was on a tight
deadline. So page 174 had to change.
A
character had just turned on her car radio, and it scanned to an
oldies station. Suddenly she was back with her boyfriend in 1965 at
their senior prom, hearing their favorite song.
A
natural segue for a brief flashback. With one problem: the author
quoted the song’s entire chorus.
Enter
the copyright police. While lawyers struggle to define exactly how
much of a copyrighted work an author can freely cite, printing the
full chorus of a recent song (and 1964 is still considered recent) is
clearly too much. Opinions vary about whether quoting even a line is
kosher. But mentioning the title is safe.
I confirmed the author had
neither the time nor the inclination to track down the song’s
copyright holder. So now, readers will be told that Grace smiled when
the radio played “Chapel of Love” by the Dixie Cups. The next
paragraph will say they had expected that soon, they would go to a
chapel and get married. And a paragraph later, the sweetheart will
paraphrase a line of lyrics about loving until the end of time.
In
the story, the former sweetheart had done four years in prison. I
wouldn’t want the author to share a similar fate.
3 comments:
This morning I just had an editor, who is reviewing one of my proposals, ask me about the songs that will be quoted in the author's manuscript. This is just another example of one of those things that the writer needs to be aware of, even before pitching their manuscript.
It's a case where people writing historicals have an advantage over those writing contemporaries.
Good to know. Thanks!
Post a Comment